- Intubation / CPR / haemodialysis / operation / colonoscopy / OGDS etc. may not always work best for all patients.
- Sometimes comfort care is what the patient really needs.
Before any (invasive) intervention, we always counsel family members and patients regarding benefit VS harm (risks / complications including unnecsessary pain / bleeding) of that particular procedure. Usually we should avoid the ones that bring more harm than benefit.
How about in district hospital without specialist?
We can always consult the primary team (e.g. uro, surgery, medical, oncology etc.) for long term plan for that particular patient.
Situation A: Patient X with underlying prostate ca with metastasis deteriorated in ward -> intubated to secure secure airway -> updated to primary team (Uro) -> uro input was for comfort care, no active uro intervention and should not intubate the patient
Situation B: Patient X with underlying prostate ca with metastasis deteriorated in ward -> updated to primary team (Uro) -> uro input was for comfort care, no active intervention and should not intubate the patient -> patient not intubated -> patient still had some responses, which actually meant a lot to his/her family members
I believe Situation B would be better, if possible.
**Just some thoughts based on few cases that I’ve encountered before this.
Conclusion: Do the best for patients. But the best treatment is not always limited to those active intervention.
Telegram link: https://t.me/nota_perubatan/1092
